Another critique of The China Study, this one from Dr. Michael Eades.
“The Vegan Dietitian” Virginia Messina comments on a study showing that most vegans are deficient in B12 and disses The China Study for downplaying the need for vegans to supplement.
--Tagged under: Nutrition--
--Tagged under: Nutrition--
--Tagged under: Vegan Leaders--
Chris Masterjohn, who wrote the previous go-to case against The China Study, “The Truth About The China Study,” gives his approval to Denise Minger’s more rigorous version.
Now we’re just waiting on Anthony Colpo (“The China Study: More Vegan Nonsense!”), Monica Reinagel (“Diet and Breast Cancer: Is Dairy a Culprit?”), Ned Kock (“The China Study again: A multivariate analysis suggesting that schistosomiasis rules!”), Beyond Vegetarianism (“The Cornell China Project: Authoritative Proof, or Misinterpretation by Dietary Advocates?”) Frank B Hu and Walter Willett (”Reply to TC Campbell”), Richard M. Kroeker (“Analyzing the China Study Dataset”) Kristy A. (“The Study Everyone Talks About: Correlation is NOT Causation”) and David Getoff (“Holes in the China Study”).
Not really. I just wanted to put all those links in one place.
--Tagged under: Nutrition--
I was browsing the American Dietetic Association’s site and saw this odd document called “Vegetarian Eating: Fact vs. Fiction” (PDF).
No doubt this is from the Vegetarian Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group, the official pro-vegetarian wing of the ADA (although all of the ADA supposedly agrees). But a couple of these “Myth” and “Fact” comparisons are surprising, even coming from the ADA’s veg*an contingent:
Myth: Vegetarianism is just a fad that will pass in a few years.
Fact: Most people throughout world history have eaten a largely vegetarian diet. Relatively recently, in Europe and North America, where meat and animal products have become affordable, diets centered around meats have become widespread. In other parts of the world, plant-based diets remain more common.
Which is why it’s so easy to travel as a vegan. Meat is a relatively new thing? What is their source for this? The freaking China Study?
Myth: A vegetarian diet is too strict and limiting. It would be too hard to follow.
Fact: There are many different types of vegetarian diets. A lacto-ovo vegetarian avoids meat, fish and poultry but may eat eggs and dairy products. A lacto-vegetarian will avoid meat, fish, and poultry but will eat milk, cheese and dairy. They will avoid eggs or derivatives of eggs. Vegans are strict vegetarians who avoid all animal products.
That one is more awkward than anything else, and a bit of a non-sequitur on a site that is supposedly all about nutrition and not preaching a veggie lifestyle. (Why does the ADA feel compelled to insist that vegetarianism isn’t difficult? Working with people who have chosen vegetarianism is different than trying to talk them into it.) But after including “vegan” under the definition of “vegetarian,” they go on to say…
Myth: Vegetarians need to take vitamin or mineral supplements.
Fact: Most healthy vegetarians don’t need to take supplements although there may be exceptions. Someone switching to a vegetarian diet should meet with a registered dietitian to be sure that all necessary vitamins and minerals are being consumed from food sources.
Vegetarians (and vegans?) don’t need to supplement? What is the ADA trying accomplish with this? Are they more concerned with educating us on adequate nutrition or with spreading vegetarianism? They don’t even want to mention B12 in case any non-supplementing vegans are reading this for validation?
Apparently these sorts of articles do have an effect, judging by a letter published in the ADA’s Vegetarian Nutrition Update:
I have just recently decided to become a vegan-I am also a Registered Dietitian. I work in an outpatient hospital setting doing education in a cardiac rehab program and I am working on building a private practice. I have been overwhelmed with the plethora of acceptable research on the health benefits of vegan diets-especially T. Colin Campbell’s The China Study and the information on this ADA [Vegetarian Nutrition Dietetic Practice Group’s] web site. … I am getting so much resistance from clients to even listen to or read the compelling information on the health benefits of a milk- and meat-free diet. I don’t want to be pushy but I want them to be well informed as well.
--Tagged under: Nutrition--
Or so says The Irish Times:
Meagher was advised to re-introduce meat into her diet after she developed pernicious anaemia in her 30s – a condition which manifested itself in chronic tiredness and constant migraines. Through her own work as a medical herbalist, she says she encounters clients who are not faring as well on a vegetarian diet.
“I’d estimate that about 40 per cent of the vegetarian population that I treat develop health problems that are directly related to their diet,” says Meagher.
“Typical problems that arise could include low energy levels, muscle fatigue, lowered immune systems and menstrual problems,” she states.
--Tagged under: Nutrition--
--Tagged under: Nutrition--
Neal Barnard (Physician’s Committee for Responsible Medicine): “Everyone in the field of nutrition science stands on the shoulders of T. Colin Campbell, who is one of the giants in the field. This is one of the most important books about nutrition ever written — reading it may save your life.”
Dr. John McDougall: This landmark research shows that even small increases in the consumption of animal-based foods are associated with an important increased risk of disease. The recently published book The China Study has become an instant national best-seller, and is one of the few books on Dr. McDougall’s highly recommended list. (Dr. McDougall and Dr. Campbell have been friends and have worked together to change the way people think about food for more than 15 years.)
Dean Ornish, MD: “The China Study is the most convincing evidence yet on preventing heart disease, cancer and other Western diseases by dietary means.”
Marilyn Gentry (President, American Institute for Cancer Research): “Today, AICR advocates a predominantly plant-based diet for lower cancer risk because of the great work Dr. Campbell and just a few other visionaries began 25 years ago.”
John Robbins: “Dr. Campbell’s new book—The China Study—is a great ray of light in the darkness of our times, illuminating the landscape and the realities of diet and health so clearly, so fully, that you need never again fall prey to those who profit from keeping you misinformed, confused and obediently eating the foods they sell. … If you heed the counsel of this outstanding guide, your body will thank you every day for the rest of your life.”
Marty Davey (vegan dietitian): “[The China Study] is the most definitive study done on the negative repercussions by human ingestion of animal products.”
Joel Fuhrman, M.D.: ”If you’re looking to enhance your health, performance and your success, read The China Study immediately. Finally, scientifically valid guidance on how much protein we need and where we should get it. The impact of these findings is enormous.”
Douglas J. Lisle, Ph.D. and Alan Goldhamer (The Pleasure Trap): “Dr. Campbell’s only agenda is truth. As a distinguished professor at Cornell University, Dr. Campbell is the Einstein of nutrition. The China Study is based on hardcore scientific research, not the rank speculation of a Zone, Atkins, SugarBusters or any other current fad.”
Amanda Woodvine (Vegetarian & Vegan Foundation): There is a compelling case that animal proteins – independent of other associated nutrients – increase the risk for cancer, atherosclerosis, osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes… This was particularly evident in the China Study – one of the largest and most comprehensive studies ever undertaken to examine the relationship between diet and disease. Huge differences were seen in disease rates based on the amount of plant foods participants ate compared to animal foods (Campbellet al., 1993; Campbell and Junshi, 1994; Campbell and Campbell, 2005).
Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn: “Well, there are many reasons why they should read The China Study. There are a lot of wonderful things that Campbell has recorded there.”
Bradly Saul (OrganicAthlete.org): “The China Study is the most important book on nutrition and health to come out in the last 75 years. Everyone should read it and it should be the model for all nutrition programs taught at universities. … The science is clearly conclusive: the best diet for humans is the vegan diet.”
Rory Freedman and Kim Barnouin (Skinny Bastard): “It’s absolutely the most compelling, well-researched, in-depth book on nutrition we’ve ever come across. … Please go back and reread Dr. Campbell’s credentials and the background information about The China Study once more. Acknowledge that The China Study isn’t some hole-filled, half-baked, fluff piece, but that it’s the real deal. Now get on board. Seriously. This is no joke. This is literally a matter of life and death. Do not dismiss this information just because it seems outlandish and hard to believe.”
John Mackey (Whole Foods CEO): “The most important book on health, diet and nutrition ever written. Its impact will only grow over time and it will ultimately improve the health and longevity of tens of millions of people around the world.”
Howard Lyman: “[T. Colin Campbell has] authored hundreds of scientific papers, sat on numerous government expert panels and helped shape national and international diet and health organizations, like The American Institute for Cancer Research/World Cancer Research Fund. As a scientist, he has played an instrumental role in how our country views diet and health. … Whether you have interest in your personal health or in the wretched state of health in the United States, this book will richly reward you.”
Jill Nussinow (vegan dietitian): “Don’t become obsessed with getting enough protein, as few people are deficient. … To keep protein in perspective, you might want to readThe China Study by T. Colin Campbell, Ph.D.”
Pamela Rice (101 reasons why I’m a vegetarian): “From the 8,000 significant correlations the study brought forth—a bonanza by any measure—we can now feel confident in the assertion that to be human is to be vegetarian. … Taking everything into account, Dr. Campbell has concluded that animal protein should be labeled a carcinogen. ‘In my view, no chemical carcinogen is nearly so important in causing human cancer as animal protein,’ he asserts. … Ultimately, the epic examination known as the China Study provides a world-class vegetarian vindication.”
--Tagged under: Vegan Quotes--
--Tagged under: Nutrition--
When the question of veganism’s healthfulness arises, vegans will say either “The American Dietetic Association says the vegan diet is appropriate for all stages of the life-cycle” or “Read The China Study.” (Or, lately, “Vegetarian Adventists are in a better mood”). But Denise Minger potentially just kicked away that second crutch.
Denise is an ex-vegan who went through the original China Study data and thoroughly dismantled T. Colin Campbell’s veganism-promoting conclusions.
Oh man, ex-vegans love shit like this. I haven’t been this excited since Zooey Deschanel threw in the towel.
I haven’t read Denise’s entries yet, so I can’t honestly claim that the days of vegans lazily citing The China Study without rebuttal are over. But T. Colin Campbell critic Richard Nikoley of Free The Animal says it beats Chris Masterjohn’s The China Study take-down over at Cholesterol and Health.
The real question is, does Denise’s entry beat my contribution to this cause, pointing out that T. Colin Campbell looks unhealthy?
Even though I haven’t read it yet: Yes. Yes it does.
Let’s hope that Minger’s upending of T. Colin Campbell’s life work inspires Campbell to make his next project The Korean BBQ Study. However, if his conclusion is anything other than “Yum!”, Minger will have some more debunking to do.
--Tagged under: Nutrition--
Oshun at Vegans of Color thinks there may be some truth in Dr. Andrew Weil’s Huffington Post column exonorating saturated fat and deeming “refined carbohydrates, starches and sugars” the culprits in coronary heart disease and diabetes, as well the most likely dietary villains in regards to cancer, Alzheimer’s disease “and other chronic diseases of modern civilization.”
Despite disapproving of Weil’s use of the word “civilization” to describe über-developed modernity in “the global n/North,” Oshun found Weil’s interpretation of the science fairly convincing.
That’s bad for vegans, since animal products are all significant sources of fat and protein, making veganism relatively heavy on the carbs. Even though many vegans say that health is one of the “wrong reasons” to be vegan (ethics is the right reason), few vegans will concede that they are actively harming themselves for “the animals.”
But Oshun thinks it’s an issue vegans should think about:
As a two-year vegan who once struggled tremendously with the over-consumption of grains, breads and pastas, I know I am not the only who benefits from this conversation. Personal reflection and community engagement has shown me that vegans (especially vegans still exploring what fundamentally works for them) often adopt diets that centralize carbohydrates and animal-product-free refined foods. …
I would like to seriously consider whether the disproportionately high carb intake for many of us may be leading vegans in North America away from optimal fitness and toward refined-food-related illness as well. Would you disagree?
--Tagged under: Nutrition--