Why Vegans Don’t Join Freegan Omnivores

When vegans are challenged on the impact that their consumer vegan lifestyles have on the planet — the destruction to animal habitats caused by supporting agriculture, the fossil fuel burned in all stages of food production, the animals that are killed in the harvesting of grains, etc. — they typically admit that their diets are not entirely death-free, even though there are no dead animals on their plate. “But,” they will add, “at least I have less of an impact than you.”

Sure, the industrial production of vegetables, grains and beans is often deadly for insects, mammals and fish, and it’s certainly not carbon neutral, but compare the damage caused by eating these foods directly to the suffering and destruction wrought by omnivores who inefficiently funnel those grains and beans through animals first. Veganism isn’t perfect, vegans admit, but it is the best way for anyone to reduce their negative impact on the world while still surviving.

Unfortunately, this isn’t true. Freeganism would reduce their impact even more… even if they were still eating animal products. 

Read More

--Tagged under: Ethics--

--Tagged under: Purity--

The History of My Diet

One possible criticism of this blog is that I did veganism wrong; veganism didn’t fail me — I failed it. Now that I have no reason to keep this blog anonymous, I can talk about myself a little more. So here’s a history of my diet up until now.

Childhood. One Sunday night at a family meeting, my mom tells my brother and I to choose a meal for every day of the week. Whatever we choose would then be repeated week after week after week. Since the next day was Monday, we decide Mondays would be pizza night. I think we might have made Thursdays pork chop night (pushing it toward the back of the week since neither of us liked pork chops), but I don’t remember any of the others because pizza night was the only one that stuck.

Read More

--Tagged under: When I Was Vegan--

--Tagged under: Health--

--Tagged under: Purity--

--Tagged under: Vegan Cult--

--Tagged under: Self-Denial--

Do Vegans Remember The Taste Of Animal Products?

I tested the waters of non-veganism with little bits of salmon, but it wasn’t until Thanksgiving of 2007 — after 10 years of meat abstinence — that I had my first real taste of meat again. Even though I didn’t think I remembered what meat tasted like, as soon as I tasted the turkey, it felt entirely familiar, as if I had never stopped. But what about current vegans? Do any of them remember the taste of animal products?

Linxie: I stopped eating meat almost 20 years ago but I still have quite vivid memories of it. It haunts me to this day!

JC: One time someone offered me some bread in a restaurant which they assured me was vegan. I said it smelt as though it had egg in it, so they asked the waiter and he said it was fine. It took a bite, then spat it out and said ‘that’s got egg.’ They asked another waiter, and it did.

BJJNick: I’m a little ashamed that I still like the smell of some meats. Damn conditioning!!

kokopelli: I used to find the smell of bacon cooking appetizing for a while after I first gave up eating meat (about 34 years ago) but at some point it started smelling really bad and now the smell of any kind of meat cooking makes me want to hold my breath until I get out of range. I expect the same thing will happen to you.

Sandra: I imagine as time goes on, the smell of meat will not have the same effect on you. It’s understandable to associate what you have been used to eating from childhood as food.

RainInStarlight: I did make a seitan stew one time, and it freaked me out a bit because the texture was just so meat-like. It kind of threw me off and made me a bit squeamish. Weird, because I knew exactly what was in the stew (made it from scratch), but it was just so similar…

Mazatael: Earlier this year I accidentally put some meat in my mouth which I didn’t realize until I started chewing (the ingredient list didn’t mention meat). It was the most disgusting experience I’ve had. It tasted awfully awful. Eww X100. A lot of soy meat is very similar to that, though.

--Tagged under: Vegan Quotes--

--Tagged under: Purity--

--Tagged under: Self-Denial--

How Veganism is Like Abstinence-Only Sex Education

Veganism is a philosophy that emphasizes abstinence from animal products to the exclusion of all other alternatives to factory farming, particularly regarding free range, organic, locally raised animal products. This lifestyle promotes animal product abstinence until death and either completely avoids any discussion about raising animals humanely for meat and dairy, or ridicules the inadequacies of attempts to do so.

Sound like anything else we know?

Abstinence-only sex education is a form of sex education that emphasizes abstinence from sex to the exclusion of all other types of sexual and reproductive health education, particularly regarding birth control and safe sex. This type of sex education promotes sexual abstinence until marriage and either completely avoids any discussion about the use of contraceptives, or only reveals failure rates associated with such use.

Proponents of abstinence-only sex education point out that not having sex is the only way to guarantee that you will not get an STD or get pregnant. Similarly, vegans say that animal product abstinence is the only foolproof way to reduce damage to the environment, animal torture, and the odds of getting heart disease, colon cancer or E. coli.

Yet expecting everyone to abstain from all animal products is unrealistic, and by not teaching meat eaters about differences in animal product quality, vegans leave those who aren’t willing to give up all animal foods in ignorance, unlikely to make more reasonable changes to their diet that might have improved the lives of animals, been easier on the environment, or protected their health.

just_say_no_to_meat_tshirt-p235978189481075895caih_400

Just as evangelicals mock the idea of safe sex, saying sex is always risky outside the bonds of marriage, vegans don’t believe that safe meat eating is possible. They make no distinction between the health or morality of any animal products, and so preach complete avoidance. To most vegans, eating a wild-caught salmon would be no different than eating a highly processed hamburger patty made of hundreds of bovines from across the globe. Meat in any form is an indistinct glob of blood-soaked, cholesterol-ridden, cancer-causing, heart-clogging saturated fat swimming in depravity.

Even though killing a wild deer is better for the environment than raising a cow on corn, environment-loving vegans will not say that if you eat meat, try to hunt it yourself or eat animals raised on their natural diet — instead, they will explain the joys of industrially-produced textured vegetable protein burgers with nutritional yeast cheese.

A vegan will tell you that fish = mercury. And they probably won’t clarify that predator fish such as tuna, shark, dolphin, and swordfish have the most mercury, but that wild salmon, sardines, mackerel and anchovies are a safe bet. The fact that tuna has mercury is enough to taint just about everything else under the sea, except for seaweed. But even if vegans did generally recognize that some fish are healthier than others, you cannot be trusted to eat fish responsibly anyway, so it’s best that you just avoid it all together.

The most effective way to enforce abstinence is through scare tactics. The New York Times story a couple of Sundays ago about the part-time vegetarian paralyzed from a burger tainted with E. coli inspired the vegan blogger Vegetarian Star to write an entry trying to frighten flexitarians, people who only eat meat occasionally:

Is it safe to be “mostly vegetarian?”

Stephanie Smith has a heart wrenching story that may cause some flexitarians to rethink their habits.

Smith is the 22 year old woman who ate a burger tainted with e.coli and experienced a trail of medical problems, including diarrhea, seizures, and convulsions, that eventually left her paralyzed for what experts believe is for life.

Only 22 years of age.

And Smith was a dance instructor.

“I ask myself every day, ‘Why me?’ and ‘Why from a hamburger?’” Smith said of the tainted patty made by Cargill, that was labeled “American Chef’s Selection Angus Beef Patties.”

The New York Times reports that, “The Smiths were slow to suspect the hamburger. Ms. Smith ate a mostly vegetarian diet, and when she grew increasingly ill, her mother, Sharon, thought the cause might be spinach, which had been tied to a recent E. coli outbreak.”

It’s argued that meat can be made “safer,” by buying organic and taking other precautions, but every time you “cheat,” could you be putting your life in serious jeopardy?

Not much different than an evangelical gravely relating the story of young Jenny, a teenage virgin who was planning on saving herself for marriage, but then went to a party and got drunk, forgot her promise, slept with a stranger, and got HIV her first time having sex.

The real lesson there is that Jenny should have used protection and been more selective about who she slept with. Just as the lesson from Stephanie Smith’s story isn’t that nobody should eat meat ever, but that we should be more careful about what meat we do eat, and how we prepare it. That, however, implies that life is complicated and full of gray areas and difficult choices, something that “no sex” and “no meat” activists don’t tend to admit.

What makes the vegan sermon even weaker than the evangelical anti-sex version is that while complete sexual abstinence is an extreme measure, it will at least accomplish what proponents claim. But if some of us were to follow Vegetarian Star’s advice and avoid all meat because Stephanie Smith’s life was ruined from a bad burger, that wouldn’t necessarily save us.

According to a reliable authority: “A main source of [E. coli] infection is undercooked ground beef; other sources include consumption of raw milk and juice, raw sprouts, lettuce, and salami, and contact with infected live animals.”

If Vegetarian Star wanted to steer his readers away from all food sources of E. coli, he wouldn’t tell us to avoid all meat, he would warn us from processed meats, raw dairy, and high-risk vegetables (or at least tell us to wash those vegetables more thoroughly). He would also suggest not going to the vegan-run Farm Sanctuary and petting the animals there.

Influenced by such advice, a meat eater might think to skip the ground beef from Cargill and go to the deli counter for the much safer and healthier buffalo steak. But Vegetarian Star doesn’t want us to be safer meat eaters. He wants us to be born again meat virgins.

If veganism were only about health, it’s unlikely that vegans would take such a hard line. And if abstinence-only sex education were mainly about avoiding disease, it wouldn’t be so afraid of compromises like “the c word” (as my high school health teacher referred to condoms). But both have grander motivations than that: morality. Sex and meat are simply wrong, so even if there are ways to get away with doing them, you shouldn’t.

To the anti-sex league, sex outside of marriage is innately dirty and illicit. It is especially harmful to the moral fiber of those who engage in it, but it is so bad that its very existence brings a dark cloud even to the lives of those who do the right thing and wait for marriage, just from dwelling in the same society as these miscreants.

To vegans, it doesn’t make sense to delve into the nuances of what animals might be better to eat than others from a health, environmental and moral perspective, because what nuance could there be in torturing and then murdering another being for culinary delight? It’s not just meat eaters who suffer the consequences of this indecent behavior. Vegans do too, by having to be around it.

no-meat-shirt

More than any other group than I know of (besides maybe factory farmers), vegans are the ones who shut down discussions of improving the conditions of animals that are going to be slaughtered.

Vegans ridicule the meat from animals raised in more humane ways as “happy meat,” and will almost never recommend it over eating meat from factory farms. Meat eaters who do go out of their way for free range meat rankle vegans with their “hypocrisy”. They are no better than the standard meat eater, just more deluded and self-serving.

Google “humane slaughter” and “free range” together and the first page is mainly vegan sites devoted to exposing the “humane myth.” Their primary critique seems to be that it is tried at all. Factory farming is what vegans point to when they criticize meat — to them the two are inextricably aligned, like premarital sex and abortion — so they refuse to consider that there might be a better way of raising animals for meat and dairy. Humane alternatives are doomed to fail because factory farming and slaughterhouses have convinced vegans that all meat is inherently evil.

Students of abstinence-only education can’t distinguish between safe ways of having sex and unsafe ways, because they haven’t been taught them. So if they aren’t scared away from sex, they often have sex without a condom and risk pregnancy and STDs, because they don’t know that there are better and worse ways to do it — it’s all the same to them.

Similarly, meat eaters who learn from vegans that all animal products are equally bad may continue to eat meat unwisely, eating fast food, fish sticks, nuggets and hamburgers, rather than seeking out healthier and more environmentally sound alternatives.

As if to make the allegory even more relevant, some vegans practice sexual abstinence along with their meat abstinence, at least when it comes to meat eaters. This phenomenon was first covered a couple of years ago in New Zealand. The woman who “discovered” vegans who don’t sleep with omnivores named them vegansexuals. The vegansexual reasoning was that omnivores are a literal graveyard of animal bodies, which kind of makes them less appealing to sexually ravage.

There is still a significant difference between meat abstinence and sex abstinence, though. Sexual puritanism at least provides something to look forward to - getting married and having sex one day. Vegans won’t even give us a meat-eating heaven.

--Tagged under: Vegan Cult--

--Tagged under: Purity--

--Tagged under: Self-Denial--

Why Vegans Love Processed Foods, Part Two: The Magic V

The second reason vegans love processed food is conditioning. They learn to look for food items with labels that say “VEGAN” or “V,” and these can only be found on processed foods.

Vegan App 2Vegan Vvgansuitable vegan

For a new vegan, these V labels are a helpful reference, a quick way to tell if a product is okay or not. “Look for the V,” seasoned vegans will tell the newbies. In a sea of immoral, animal-bloodied foods, these labels are like so many little lighthouses, pointing a vegan home.

Over time, these labels take on a power of their own. They stop simply drawing attention to the products they’re on, and become the draw themselves. The magic V is enough to make a vegan’s pulse rise and mouth salivate. It’s all a vegan needs to see before making a purchase decision.

“This product is okay to eat” evolves into “Eat me, vegan, and eat me now!” The label even makes the food taste better. For maximum gustatory pleasure, vegans should stare at the label while they eat (lingering on the vegan ingredients helps too). A vegan reading this entry and seeing all these labels would have drenched their keyboard in saliva by now.

I wonder how many vegans saw “V For Vendetta,” just because the poster made them hungry.

V for Vegandetta

To understand the power of these labels, pretend that non-vegan food was labeled “Totally Fucking Badass,” and non-vegans believed it. A food labeled “vegan” feeds into the vegan identity the same way that a shirt or mug that says vegan does. It allows vegans to absorb themselves into the vegan whole, a throbbing mass of disciplined, healthy, animal-loving people who are going to save the world.

Picture 8Mug

When they eat a food marked like this, it’s as if they are consuming veganism itself, and the concept becomes an even greater part of them (excluding the veganism that they shit out, I guess). Obviously, the more vegan they can be, the better.

Vegans, then, would rather eat a processed product that says “Vegan” on it than an unmarked, unprocessed, obviously vegan fruit or vegetable. In fact, vegans would burn mountains of fresh vegetables and fruits to get to a box of frozen food with this V on it.

Now why is something more vegan just because it says vegan? Obviously pure conditioning has a lot to do with it - the word vegan simply creates immediate reactions in the vegan mind. But company intent and a product’s awareness of its own veganism also have a lot to do with it. A company that labels its food vegan is considered especially “vegan friendly.” This company is aware that vegans exist, which most companies don’t seem to know, and even better, they are making a special effort to court them. They want vegans to love them, and vegans are happy to oblige.

A grocery store that only sold fruits and vegetables isn’t considered particularly vegan, because fruits and vegetables are for everybody. An important part of the vegan identity is separatism - vegans buy things that meat eaters don’t. So put some magic V’s on those shelves, call yourself a co-op, and brace yourself for the vegan flood.

It wouldn’t be a bad idea for grocery stores to habitually put V stickers on all their fruits and vegetables. They are so effective, there’s a good chance you could trick a vegan into eating a steak if you put that sticker on it. You could even warn them, “Listen, this is a rotting cow corpse, I killed the damn thing myself,” and they just wouldn’t believe you. “It has the V, I’m sure it’s fine,” they would say before happily chomping away.

Call it a V-Bone steak, Outback, and you’re in vegan business.

VBoneSteak2

I once ate a young coconut in front of a vegan. “Aren’t you going to finish it?” the vegan asked. “I did,” I said, and I showed him the empty inside of the coconut. “What about that part?” the vegan asked, pointing to the fibrous white coating that covers the outside of the coconut shell. “That part isn’t edible,” I said. He looked confused for a moment, and then mumbled, “Coconuts are weird.”

This from someone who ate coconut-milk based vegan ice creams and vegan yogurts all the time. He had no direct experience with actual coconuts, only the processed versions with the V label prominently displayed. Coconuts aren’t so weird all liquefied and mixed with thickeners and sweeteners and packaged, it seems.

I’m not saying coconut ignorance is common in vegan circles. I ate coconuts all the time when I was one. But when given the choice, a vegan would rather buy coconut yogurt than an actual coconut, because the yogurt has the label, and thus is more vegan.

Yogurt is supposed to be a non-vegan food. So when someone makes a yogurt that vegans can eat, and markets it directly to them, that makes especially vegan. “This product violated nature to suit your morals,” the label essentially says. An apple is vegan no matter what, and even meat eaters will have one now and again. Only veganism could turn soybeans into yogurt. The fucking coconut tree doesn’t give a damn about vegans, or even know they exist. But Purely Decadent vegan coconut milk-based ice cream sprung directly out of veganism. That makes it vegan to its core.

Oh, wait, maybe it does come out of coconuts this way:

PD_Coconut_Milk_CookieDough

Vegans don’t care as much about products that happen to be vegan but aren’t marketed to them. PETA has a page about popular processed foods that happen to be vegan. But most of them are accidentally vegan. Though fine in a pinch, they don’t particularly excite vegans. Without that V, they almost might as well not be vegan at all. Only the V can give it that magical ethical glow.

To capitalize on this, many vegan restaurants try to make a green letter “V” prominent in their restaurant name. Some examples are: V Spot, V Bites, and Cafe V. Some vegans in San Francisco planned to make V Restaurant, dubbing it “the greenest restaurant in the world,” but apparently they couldn’t barter up enough starting capital.

2008_04_godblesshippiesVSpotPicture 4

CafeV

Interestingly, the “Smart Choice” check mark that The New York Times reported is showing up on sugar-laden cereals - alerting parents to supposedly healthy foods like Fruit Loops - looks a lot like the vegan V.

05smartB-lrgP

I’m not sure the resemblance is intentional, but let’s hope it doesn’t dupe too many vegans into buying something with whey in it. That would not be a smart choice!

But if this check mark is able to conquer the subconscious buying impulses of the average shopper the way that the V plays vegans like so many harps from hell, then damn, this might be a good time to invest in check-marked breakfast cereal.

--Tagged under: Vegan Food--

--Tagged under: Health--

--Tagged under: Purity--

--Tagged under: Vegan Cult--

Throwing Out Non-Vegan Food

After I posted my SoyJoy entry, Cyrena told me that she had recently been at the apartment of one of her vegan friends as the friend received a free box of SoyJoy in the mail (as part of a promotion going on at the time). The vegan friend, and another vegan who was over, excitedly opened the box of SoyJoy and perused the ingredients. Vegans can never be too safe, and of course their vigilance was warranted: they were shocked to find that SoyJoy wasn’t vegan.

According to Cyrena, they then discussed the absurdity of a non-vegan, soy-based product for about half an hour, angry and confused that anyone would ever make such a thing. They then threw away the entire box.

Even though…

- Eating the bars would have done no more harm to animals than throwing out the box.

- Eating the bars would have done no more harm to the environment than throwing out the box.

- Eating such a small amount of animal ingredients would have had no impact on their health.

If you look at all the reasons vegans are supposedly vegans (The Vegan Trinity: Animals, Environment, Health), none of them is served by throwing out a box of snack bars. Yet this is what almost all vegans would have done.

This is because there is a secret fourth reason for veganism that compels vegans more than anything that has to do with saving the world: individual purity.

Say a vegan and a meat eater go out to dinner together. The vegan orders a seitan steak, and the meat eater orders a steak. The vegan wishes the meat eater had ordered something moral for a change, but oh well. The waiter arrives with their dishes and accidentally swaps them, giving the meat eater the fake steak, and the vegan the real one. Somehow they’re unable to detect the mistake (unlikely, but theoretically possible, if they both have no tongues) until the vegan tastes gristle on her last bite.

Realizing now that she has been eating meat all along, the vegan will feel sick, distressed, and overcome with guilt - much more so than she was by simply being at the same table as a meat eater: even though the plate-switching had no affect on the environment or the life or death of any animals, since no matter what, there was going to be one meat plate and one vegan plate at the table.

She cannot feel more bad for the animal for being eaten by her rather than the meat eater, since the result for the animal is the same. She feels bad for herself. Who gets which plate doesn’t matter to animals or the environment, but it matters to the vegan.

You could say that perhaps she is worried about the health effects of this non-vegan plate, but that doesn’t explain the SoyJoy example. Vegans feel an intense dread just from eating a product that has a little bit of whey in it. Yet they have no problem sending back a steak that was accidentally given to them, knowing it’s going straight to the garbage. As long as vegans are dumping non-vegan food outside of themselves, they feel fine, despite the fact that the effect on the outside world is the same as if they had dumped it down their mouths.

Purity and vegan identity are the most important elements of veganism. It’s less about the animals, and more about how the vegan feels about ingesting them. By eating animals, even ones that are totally done for anyway, vegans absorb some of the evil and death of the world. Better just to throw that shit out.

--Tagged under: Purity--

--Tagged under: Ethics--

The Vegan Shitlist: SoyJoy

A snack bar called “SoyJoy” just sounds vegan, doesn’t it? But the ingredients of these bars include: “Butter (from milk),” “Egg,” “Milk Chocolate Chips,” “butter oil,” “fermented milk powder” and “Parmesan Cheese.” That makes SoyJoy a non-vegan pretender, putting it high atop the vegan shitlist.

SoyJoy2

The reason SoyJoy immediately sounds vegan is that soy is a replacer food that is only rarely intended for those who can guiltlessly eat the real thing. True, soy can replace either meat or dairy, so it’s not unusual for soy to crop up in a vegetarian but not vegan scenario, as it does here. However, since most snack bars are vegetarian to begin with, it’s easy to assume that the soy here (so prominent an ingredient as to be in the name of the product) must be replacing dairy.

Yet there is both soy and dairy in SoyJoy, which not only angers vegans, but makes them a bit paranoid. What could explain this bizarre contradiction, aside from a manufacturer’s conspiratorial vendetta against vegans? Is SoyJoy a malicious Trojan horse to trick vegans into buying and ingesting animal products? And worse, have vegans been eating other foods that they had innocently assumed were pure?

A near-vegan food is one of the worst abominations a vegan can imagine. A steak is evil, sure, but at least it isn’t fooling anybody. But what can excuse an otherwise vegan product with a small amount of animal product arbitrarily thrown in on a whim? Don’t these companies know there are people with principles in the world? It’s similar to why Jewish Kashrut laws consider pigs to be a symbol of hypocrisy and evil, and about as unkosher as it gets: it looks kosher… but it ain’t kosher.

To a vegan, putting a tiny squirt of milk in an otherwise vegan product is like hocking a loogie on a delicious plate of food just before you hand it to a starving man. Since everyone thinks as much about vegans as vegans do, adding a tiny dab of whey to the end of an ingredients list is an intentional jerk thing to do. Impostor bars like SoyJoy are mass-produced taunts aimed squarely at vegans.

What makes SoyJoy even worse is that it squeezes in every non-meat animal product it can imagine, seemingly in the hope that vegans will fail to check the ingredients, eat it, and consequently find themselves guilty of not just one count, but multiple counts of impurity ingestion.

The SoyJoy site has an “Ask the SoyJoy Dietitian” page. There is only one question vegans want to ask this fraud: “WTF?”

The vegan blog Healthy Diet had this to say about Soyjoy:

Is SoyJoy vegan? Nope. Really, not vegan? A soy bar? Why not? Two slightly un-informed booth workers proceeded to check the label for me, almost as if they had never done so before. SoyJoy is not vegan. They explained that this ‘healthy’ bar contained butter, eggs, whole milk and even cheese. Now is it just me or does that throw anyone else off? … These soy bars remind me a lot of the dairy-free veggie cheese that contains casein, aka milk-protein. Totally absurd.

What’s interesting about calling near-vegan products like soy cheese with milk protein absurd (and most vegans would) is that it contradicts the usual vegan notion that vegan food is for everyone. Here “Healthy Diet” seems to be saying, “Who the hell could find joy in soy but a vegan?”

And what could be more cruel than cheating vegans out of one of the few slight joys that they have left?

--Tagged under: Vegan Shitlist--

--Tagged under: Purity--

Theme created by: Roy David Farber and Hunson. Powered By: Tumblr...
2 of 2